Skip to main content

Standards in Biomedical Informatics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Over the past three decades, the discipline of information standards has emerged from an arcane academic exercise to become a pivotal component in the quest for true semantic interoperability in healthcare. Data exchange technologies, such as HL7 FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), have become foundational for the other realms of biomedical informatics. The accompanying terminologies, vocabularies, lexicons, ontologies and data models have played critical roles in reducing ambiguity and accelerating data liquidity, benefiting clinical care, regulated and non-regulated research, population health, and emerging payment models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The current standard for railroad-track gauge originated with Roman chariot builders, who set the axle length based on the width of two horses. This axle length became a standard as road ruts developed, requiring that the wheels of chariots—and all subsequent carriages—be the right distance apart to drive in the ruts. When carriage makers were called on to develop railway rolling stock, they continued to use the same axle standard.

  2. 2.

    Interestingly, medical informaticians were responsible for the second ANSI standard language: MUMPS (now known as M).

  3. 3.

    7 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21st_Century_Cures_Act (accessed 12/2/19)

  4. 4.

    7 http://fhir.org/guides/argonaut/ (accessed 12/2/19)

  5. 5.

    7 https://www.healthit.gov/topic/standards-technology/consolidated-cda-overview (accessed 12/2/19)

  6. 6.

    7 http://www.hl7.org/about/davinci/ (accessed 12/2/19)

  7. 7.

    7 https://www.carinalliance.com/ (accessed 12/2/19)

  8. 8.

    7 http://www.healthit.gov/newsroom/about-onc (accessed 12/2/19)

  9. 9.

    7 https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm (last accessed 12/2/2019)

  10. 10.

    5 7 loinc.org (accessed 5/30/19)

References

  • American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: The American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing and Materials. (1999). Standard guide for properties of a universal healthcare identifier (UHID) (E1714-95.). West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balas, E., & Boren, S. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In J. H. van Bemmel & M. C. AT (Eds.), Yearbook of medical informatics (pp. 65–70). Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becnel, L. B., Hastak, S., Ver Hoef, W., Milius, R. P., Slack, M. A., Wold, D., Glickman, M. L., Brodsky, B., Jaffe, C., Kush, R., & Helton, E. (2017). BRIDG: A domain information model for translational and clinical protocol-driven research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(5), 882–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, M. (2018). Health informatics on FHIR: How HL7’s new API is transforming healthcare. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. E., Tuttle, M. S., & Spackman, K. A. (1998). A “lexically-suggested logical closure” metric for medical terminology maturity. In Proceedings of the 1998 AMIA Annual Fall Symposium (pp. 785–789). Orlando: American Medical Informatics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chute, C. G. (2018). The rendering of human phenotype and rare diseases in ICD-11. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 41(3), 563–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, A., McNeil, B., Bakken, S., Bickford, C., Warren, J. J., & American Nurses Association Committee on Nursing Practice Information Infrastructure. (2001). Toward comparable nursing data: American Nurses Association criteria for data sets, classification systems, and nomenclatures. Computers in Nursing, 19(6), 240–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • College of American Pathologists. (1971). Systematized nomenclature of pathology. Chicago: The College of American Pathologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté, R. A., & Rothwell, D. J. (1993). The systematised nomenclature of human and veterinary medicine, 1993. Northfield: College of American Pathologits.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferranti, J. M., Musser, R. C., Kawamoto, K., & Hammond, W. E. (2006). The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: A critical analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(3), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, H. W. (1991). The medical information bus: Overview of the medical device data language. Journal of Clinical Engineering, 16(4), 323–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. A., for the Gene Ontology Consortium, et al. (2004). The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(Database issue), D258–D256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, K. L., & Collins, F. S. (2017). The 21st century cures act — A view from the NIH. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(2), 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, B. L. (Ed.). (1990). UMLS knowledge sources – First experimental edition documentation. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organization. (1987). Information processing systems-concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base. (ISO TR 9007:1987). International Standards Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jollis, J. G., Ancukiewicz, M., DeLong, E. R., Pryor, D. B., Muhlbaier, L. H., & Mark, D. B. (1993). Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119(8), 844–850.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libicki, M. C. (1995). Information technology standards: Quest for the common byte. Boston: Digital Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Prescription Drug Programs. (1994). Data dictionary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. J., Brown, S. H., Erlbaum, M. S., Olson, N., Powell, T., Carlsen, B., Carter, J., Tuttle, M. S., & Hole, W. T. (2002). A semantic normal form for clinical drugs in the UMLS: Early experience with the VANDF. In Proceedings of the AMIA Fall Symposium (pp. 557–561). American Medical Informatics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Academy of Medicine. (1961). Standard nomenclature of diseases and operations (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS Centre for Coding and Classification. (1994). Read codes (Version 3) (April ed.). London: NHS Management Executive, Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odigie, E., Lacson, R., Raja, A., Osterbur, D., Ip, I., Schneider, L., & Khorasani, R. (2019). Fast healthcare interoperability resources, clinical quality language, and systematized nomenclature of medicine—Clinical terms in representing clinical evidence logic statements for the use of imaging procedures: Descriptive study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 7(2), e13590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. A., & Cho, I. (2009). Education, practice, and research in nursing terminology: Gaps, challenges, and opportunities. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T. H., Corley, S., Cullen, T. A., Gandhi, T. K., Harrington, L., Kuperman, G. J., Mattison, J. E., McCallie, D. P., McDonald, C. J., Tang, P. C., Tierney, W. M., Weaver, C., Weir, C. R., & Zaroukian, M. H. (2015). Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(5), 1102–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, R. J. (1952). Standard nomenclature of diseases and operations (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector, A. L., Glowinski, A. J., Nowlan, W. A., & Rossi-Mori, A. (1995). Medical-concept models and medical records: An approach based on GALEN and PEN & PAD. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 2(1), 19–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. T. (1989). The open book: A practical perspective on OSI. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simborg, D. W., Chadwick, M., Whiting-O’Keefe, Q. E., Tolchin, S. G., Kahn, S. A., & Bergan, E. S. (1983). Local area networks and the hospital. Computers and Biomedical Research, 16(3), 247–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spackman, K. A. (2000). SNOMED RT and SNOMEDCT. Promise of an international clinical terminology. MD Computing, 17(6), 29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spackman, K. A., Campbell, K. E., & Cote, R. A. (1997a). SNOMED RT: a reference terminology for health care. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium (pp. 640–644). American Medical Informatics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spackman, K. A., Campbell, K. E., et al. (1997b). SNOMED-RT: A reference terminology for health care. In D. R. Masys (Ed.), Proceedings, AMIA annual fall symposium (pp. 640–644). Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spineth, M., Rappelsberger, A., & Adlassnig, K. P. (2018). Implementing CDS hooks communication in an Arden-syntax-based clinical decision support platform. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 255, 165–169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, W. (1987). The open systems interconnection (OSI) model and OSI-related standards (Vol. 1). New York: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. W., Kelly, B. J., & Kolodner, R. M. (2005). Achievable Steps toward Building a National Health Information Infrastructure in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(2), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum, A. S. (1987). Computer networks (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. T., & Hayden, A. C. (1961). Standard nomenclature of diseases and operations (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases index. Tenth revision (Vol. Tabular list, Vol. 1). Geneva: The World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1977). International classification of diseases index. Ninth revision. Geneva: The World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Jaffe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jaffe, C., Nguyen, V., Kubick, W.R., Cooper, T., Leftwich, R.B., Hammond, W.E. (2021). Standards in Biomedical Informatics. In: Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J. (eds) Biomedical Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58720-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58721-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics