Skip to main content

Technology Strategy and Competition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology Roadmapping and Development
  • 3160 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of competition as a driver of technological progress. We take a brief historical look at the arms race during the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. We then discuss several real-world situations of technological competition in duopolies and provide a framework for quantifying this effect using game theory. We also look at technological competition through the lens of network and graph theory. Finally, we conclude by describing the role of industry standards as a way to level the playing field in terms of competition in a particular industry. The reason this topic is important in that it helps clarify the strategic input into technology roadmapping and setting clear targets to be achieved.

figure a

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While important, competition may not be the only driver for technological progress. Equally important may be other factors such as the drive for human survival, scientific curiosity, or collaboration in the form of symbiosis and altruism as often observed in nature. It is not easy to clearly separate these drivers, either historically or prospectively.

  2. 2.

    Adding different technologies in this way may lead to nonlinear interaction effects (coupling) between the different technologies. The net effect of these couplings has to be taken into account when creating a validated (by computer models or data coming from R&D projects, see Chap. 11) version of a “vector chart.”

  3. 3.

    The SA-75 was also involved in the famous downing of U2 pilot Gary Powers in 1960 above Soviet territory. This led, among other developments, to investment in so-called “stealth” technology by the United States, which affords aircraft a low level of observability (LO) and virtual invisibility from radar sensors.

  4. 4.

    The extra-large aircraft market (“XL”) for aircraft with more than 500 passengers (B747 and A380) is no longer active and only restricted to finishing up the production of the existing order book. Both aircraft will be or have been out of production by 2022.

  5. 5.

    Boeing recently cancelled the merger with Embraer resulting in ongoing legal proceedings.

  6. 6.

    This does not take into account the more disruptive switch from the internal combustion engine (ICE) to electric vehicles as discussed in Chap. 6.

  7. 7.

    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium

  8. 8.

    The situation of the Boeing B737 MAX which was a response to the Airbus A320neo can be viewed in this light.

  9. 9.

    More on the role of technological diversification will be discussed in Chap. 16 on R&D Project Definition and Portfolio Management.

  10. 10.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11

  11. 11.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G

  12. 12.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUTOSAR

References

  • Christensen, Clayton M., “The Innovator’s Dilemma - When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail”, Harvard Business Review Press, 1997, ISBN: 978-1-63369-178-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Richard, “The Attackers Advantage”, Summit Books, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepher T., “Airbus vs. Boeing Market Analysis”, Reuters, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J., Non-cooperative games. Annals of mathematics, pp.286–295, 1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova, Ksenia, Alessandro Golkar, and Rob Vingerhoeds. "A game-theoretic framework for concurrent technology roadmap planning using best-response techniques." In 2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), pp. 1–7. IEEE, 2018a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova, Ksenia, Alessandro Golkar, and Rob Vingerhoeds. "Competition-driven figures of merit in technology roadmap planning." In 2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), pp. 1–6. IEEE, 2018b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuskevich, Ilya, Rob Vingerhoeds, and Alessandro Golkar. "Two-dimensional Pareto frontier forecasting for technology planning and roadmapping." In 2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), pp. 1–7. IEEE, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabri, Nissia, “Networks of Breakthrough Technologies and their Use in Strategic Games for Competitive Advantage”, System Design and Management (SDM) Thesis, co-advised by Prof. Olivier de Weck with Prof. Alessandro Bonatti, June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, JoAnne, and Craig N. Murphy. Engineering Rules: Global Standard Setting since 1880. JHU Press, 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Weck, O.L. (2022). Technology Strategy and Competition. In: Technology Roadmapping and Development . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88346-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88346-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88345-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88346-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics